Rugby MP Mark Pawsey has called in a Westminster debate for a re-think on the proposed plans of the banks to withdraw cheque facilities. A provisional date of October 2018 has been set for the abolishment of the cheque system but this has left many individuals, charities and small businesses concerned.
In the debate Mark said:
“I was contacted by a constituent last year who was very anxious about the plans to withdraw cheques facilities. Some may ask what the fuss is about but for many, older, residents of Rugby this is a genuine concern. Under the last Labour Government we saw many local Post Offices disappear which has left a number of people with a more difficult task when it comes to accessing their own money. If cheques are abolished a great number of people will struggle to carry out presently simple tasks such as sending money to relatives at Christmas, donating to charity or paying for everyday items and services.”
The Government has pledged that suitable alternatives will be in place for all users of cheques before the system is phased out and are working closely with the banking industry to make certain that the transition from the central cheque clearing system runs as smoothly as possible so that no one is left behind.
Mark added in the debate:
“I am myself of a generation that grew up with a cheque book and I do not wish to see them go. For settling an account for services received cheques are a simple and easy method of payment not least because the chequebook stub acts to remind you which bills have been paid. Charities do not wish to see them go and many small businesses do not wish to see them go either.”
In response to Mark’s words Mark Goodwill MP, speaking for the Government, remarked:
“The number of cheques issued has declined dramatically but the Government believe that suitable alternatives must be in place for all users of cheques and we welcome the banking industry’s commitment to ensure this. The industry has said that a potential alternative to cheque facilities may include a paper system.”
Mark concluded after the debate:
“I am pleased that the Government recognises the seriousness of the issue and I have been in correspondence with the constituent who contacted me in regards to this issue who is very pleased that I was able to raise this matter in Westminster on her behalf.”